In response to a successful lawsuit in January 2022, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was compelled by a District Court in Texas to release an estimated 450,000 documents the FDA said it relied upon to license Pfizer’s Covid 19 injection for those over 16 years of age.

In that decision, Judge Mark T. Pittman rejected Pfizer’s argument that they could only release 500 pages per month (of the 450,000). In so doing, Judge Pittman noted that, at that rate, it would take Pfizer up to 75 years to make public the entire tranche. One supposes that rather than waiting until everyone involved in the case was dead, Judge Pittman ordered Pfizer to comply with the order at the rate of 55,000 documents per month.¹

This exercise should have been completed by about November 2022. However, after the Judge’s decision, Pfizer revised its document estimate upwards to 1.2 million documents—which took until November 2023 to release. After scientists analyzed the data release, they noted that much of the information that informed the FDAs Covid injection approval appeared to be missing. Despite this, the FDA claimed they had released everything as ordered.

Under pressure, the government department subsequently admitted that it had failed to disclose a million additional pages of information they used to license the injection for release on the population—but stated on record that the documents were not relevant anyway. The suit went back to US District Court. In December of 2024, Judge Pittman ruled against the FDA and ordered them to produce the additional million pages related to the Pfizer injection by June 30, 2025.²

Given the initial tranche of 450,000 FDA documents, which clearly highlighted what little evidence the FDA had to base its false “safe and effective” narrative upon, one can only speculate what additional uncomfortable truths are set to be released between now and June. “Oh, Rochelle Walensky? The FBI may need to speak to you about one or two things if you have a minute”.

In its decision, the US Court invoked the words of founding father and former governor of Virginia, Patrick Henry, from the Constitutional Convention of 1787: “The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them.”

This is rare but encouraging evidence that in the right judicial hands, a Western democracy’s 237-year-old Constitution can still be wielded to preserve liberty instead of ignoring, denying, or trampling it. (Here’s looking at you, Ottawa).

1. https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/97544

2. https://casetext.com/case/pub-health-med-professionals-for-transparency-v-food-drug-admin