By Cory Edmund Endrulat

The kind of content those who challenge the mainstream narrative produce is different from any other content. It doesn’t follow the same guidelines, it doesn’t appeal to the same audiences, and it doesn’t often make people’s day better. Yet, if it weren’t for them, who would? And if they challenge the mainstream for some sense of truth not yet embraced, then a better day is the goal, a better future and world is the destiny. In addition, if they choose to be on certain platforms to share such, they can only hope the guidelines support their efforts as anyone else would. Also, the thoughts that arise in such individuals mean they are not alone, and sooner or later, people come to know of them, and they find an audience. Therefore, it may seem that those who challenge the status quo are still on fair ground with those who don’t.

Except for one big problem: Married like slavery and rebellion, the nature of the status quo and the current truths of the time are at war over deceit and censorship. The more extreme the views become, the more the hardships will be unlike anything else. Also, to call for suppressing another is asking for your own suppression, as it is in every form since it is the golden rule. Nevertheless, voluntary communities always persist, and to respect boundaries, as such, is often the very reason why people are so concerned for the truth when it isn’t respected. When those who speak the truth feel like they aren’t being heard in a world where some platforms dominate and actively push content that promotes deceit, suppression occurs, and people ignore it. If it weren’t for systems of suppression, there would be no systematic truthers. If it weren’t for disregard and attack, there would be less fuel to the fire of those with a burning passion for sharing the truth.

Essentially, suppression breeds distrust and division and the need for transparency and unity, which is no surprise psychologically and by understanding the Taoism’s ancient wisdom. More controls do not generate more unity and order—quite the opposite. And it is not that social platforms are to have no control; it’s to say that contrary to popular belief, freedom creates order with the proper restraints that make freedom possible. Those said restraints are debated endlessly in governments that use violence against those who do not comply. Whereas, when it comes to social platforms, such restraints are not so much the issue if one can voluntarily leave such platforms, join others, or create their own; however, again, the problem arises when these platforms become dominant, and individuals feel like they have no choice. In reality, however, they do. They always do. For governments, they always don’t, unless they are without, for which this possibility tells us again that people always do have the choice even when they think they don’t. People create all these systems: the businesses, the products, the services, the industries, the governments, the religions, all of it.

Even if some claim these systems are the works of God or nature, it is a man or woman who delivers and adds their touch, which is always a choice. We know that nature gives what we cannot change by choice— truth itself. And those who would limit choice can only attempt to do so because truth declares that we always have a choice—and truth is always one of the choices. In other words, those who limit truth limit choice, and those who limit choice limit truth. Those who limit voluntary interaction limit freedom and ownership and limit the rules, which tells us the problem with rulers. Limits are all that can be set for one’s nature of infinite potential, a light ever waiting to be shined. Whereas the individual of truth doesn’t set limits upon evil, they abolish it altogether because it’s evil and should not be permitted. The only limits the individual of truth sets are their own because, again, the rules overrule the rulers; the individual overrules some person imagining to be some “authority” over others. Precisely why do we, as ordinary individuals, overrule authority figures? Because, in truth, we are all just people, and we stand with the truth.

Originally published in https://www.theliberator.us/post/suppression-breeds-conspiracy-theorists