By Amanda Ridding | amandaridding.substack.com

On the morning following one of the most questionable elections in Canadian history, it may be the perfect time to inform and educate Canadians of his or her own power.

Canada’s House of Commons was not hijacked on April 28, 2025. No, Canada’s House of Commons was hijacked long before most of us, if not all of us, were even born.

It began with the first de facto Prime Minister, Robert Walpole, in 1721—a proverbial Trojan Horse established 32 years after the Glorious Revolution and the English Bill of Rights of 1689.

Canada has a codified constitution. No, it is NOT “the Charter.”

Canada’s Constitution is the British North America Act 1867. The consolidated version is wrongfully known as the CONSTITUTION ACT 1867.

The Charter, which falls under the CONSTITUTION ACT 1982, is nothing more than registered regulation SI/82-97.

For the record, regulations may not supersede the laws they fall under.

To be “of Canada”

To be “of” your family, you had to be born, married, or adopted into your family.

Likewise, to be “of Canada,” Canada, or a province thereof, had to first create and establish the person, place, or thing by a Statute or Act of legislation for the person, place, or thing to be “of Canada.”

In law, constitutionally speaking, ministers of the Crown DO NOT have any power to legislate. These persons belong to, or are supposed to belong to, a separate and independent branch of government known as the executive governments, which are solely administrative in nature and serve “at His Majesty’s pleasure.”

Legislative power is in the hands of the commoners, namely, We, the People of Canada, through our House of Commons.

The House of Commons is created by our Supreme Law, the British North America Act 1867, under the authorities of Section 17, 37–52.

The Leader of the House of Commons is the Speaker of the House under authority of Section 44 of the British North America Act 1867.

The Emperor has no clothes

As you can see, the law makes and establishes the House of Commons and the Speaker of the House to be “of Canada.” Canadian Statute created and established each of these persons, places, or things, as seen, officially in law.

What Canadian law has not created or established officially is any political party or any Prime Minister.

To be clear, there is NO constituting instrument which creates and establishes any political party or Prime Minister “of Canada.”

We’ve been lied to. Even Wikipedia knows that there is no “constituting instrument” to establish a Prime Minister.

Look for yourself and stop acknowledging the existence of a Prime Minister. There is no such thing as a Prime Minister “of Canada.”

Moreover, being a privately established political party and nominated from within one’s own party to lead makes the party and its leader agents of a state other than Canada.

Put another way, political parties and their leaders are all domestic foreign agents to Canada.

Think it through, folks. Only 131,674 people decided who would lead their private corporate political party, the Liberal Party of Canada, which was not officially created by Canada.

Only 131,674 people determined who would lead a country of 38,000,000 + people. Really? I don’t think so when reading the law.

WAKE UP!

Political parties are nothing more than private corporations

As best as I can tell, every political party known to man is a privately established corporation.

God only knows who founded each one. At least we know who many of the controllers are, as they largely fund them in plain sight, through private corporate donations to each private party corporation.

Unless you live in Nepean, you DID NOT have Mark Carney’s name on your ballot.

Moreover, most Canadians voted not for a man or a woman but for a political party. Seriously…WTF!

We have all been conned into voting for privately established political party corporations that represent their own interests instead of the individuals who are supposed to represent the interests of his or her Electoral District.

These “elected representatives” are supposed to act in the interests of his or her Electoral Districts, BUT they don’t! How many times has your elected representative “toed the party line” so as not to be excommunicated from his or her private political party corporation?

Every member of a private political party corporation puts the interests of his or her ties to his or her private political party corporation before the interests of his or her own Electoral District.

Repeat after me…Conflict of Interest.

This is NOT constitutionally how Canada’s structure is to be set up and established.

As we have all just witnessed, at “election time” these private corporate political machines wrongfully group our issues together, into one “party platform,” in order to falsely create a “mandate” from which these private corporate political machines may justify creating constitutionally repugnant laws and regulations to control and screw us Canadians.

And so you know, constitutionally repugnant means to go against, or be without, the authority established by and with the provisions set out in Canada’s British North America Act 1867.

Seriously, they tell us what constitutionally repugnant laws they will make if elected, and we walk right into it, without proper challenge.

Public contracts

In the guise of useful information, there is so much noise being distributed and or conflated by politicians, media on both sides, the education system, and by people themselves; it’s no wonder people are so dazed and confused. No, it’s not your fault, but as you become aware, should you do nothing, that would be your fault.

In law, each issue should be addressed one issue at a time. Issues should not be grouped into “a party platform” from which we have to choose the lesser of two evils. Forget that nonsense!

Our House of Commons is meant to be a House of independent representatives—a National citizens’ assembly, if you will. It would give each and every Electoral District an equal voice and equal standing for all Canadians of all provinces.

These independent representatives are supposed to only represent the interests of his or her Electoral District, while forsaking all others.

The Speaker of the House is the House Leader under authority of Section 44 of the British North America Act 1867.

The Governor General, not the Prime Minister, is the commander-in-chief under authority of Section 10 of the British North America Act 1867, and acknowledged and accepted on the Governor General’s own website, seen here: gg.ca/en/governor-general/role-and-responsibilities.

Neither Mackenzie King, with his 1940 Order in Council, nor George VI, with his Letters Patent, had any right to diminish the Governor General’s powers, as no authority, duly made under the provisions set out in the British North America Act 1867, was provided to either one to act.

It is through our elected representatives of the House of Commons that We, the People tell, or are supposed to tell, the Governor General what to do.

That’s right. The Parliament’s job is simply to participate in the making of public contracts that we call Acts of legislation. The Governor General and all public servants under her must abide by these Acts of legislation, as each is bound by his or her official public servant capacity they willingly assumed under Canada’s Constitution.

Because legislation is very much a process of public contract negotiation, the House of Commons represents the interests of Canadians through our Electoral Districts and the Senate represents the interests of the State, and the State is Headed by His Majesty of Canada, not of the United Kingdom, under authority of Section 9 of the British North America Act 1867.

That’s right, His Majesty of Canada is not the same person as His Majesty of the United Kingdom.

Should the Governor General act on behalf of and in the Name of His Majesty, under authority of Section 10 of the British North America Act 1867, and not want to accept the responsibility of administering the public contract as passed by the House of Commons and the Senate, then the Governor General does not have to accept the public contract and give that Act Royal Assent.

Royal Assent is simply the State accepting the responsibility to administer the public contract as passed by the House of Commons and the Senate.

To be clear, if no public contract exists to give any public servant the authority to act, then that public servant may not act.

The State may forward Bills (an offer to contract) to the House of Commons, but the House of Commons does not need to pass any of them. That is not only the House of Commons’ prerogative, but also the House of Commons’ right on behalf of the electors of each and every Electoral District.

Both sides have the right not to pass any Bill into law, just as the Head of State has the right not to administer any law, which has been passed. This is nothing more than Contract Law 101. So simple, and yet so obfuscated, and misrepresented.

Separation of governments

The House of Commons belongs to the commoners—We, the People.

The State has the Senate.

In law, constitutionally speaking, no one from the State should ever be on the floor of the House of Commons while the Commons is in session.

And yet, by and with the interference of these private corporate political machines, Parliament and each Provincial Legislature have created constitutionally repugnant legislation that violates the sanctity of Canada’s Constitution and allows Conflicts of Interest to exist.

These various, constitutionally repugnant Acts of legislation not only acknowledge these Conflicts of Interest but go on to allow a member of Parliament to assume the role of a minister of the Crown to “serve at His Majesty’s pleasure.”

That’s like a divorce lawyer representing both the husband and the wife in the same divorce, and the lawyer representative serving at “the husband’s pleasure.”

Some of our members of Parliament assume one or more additional Titles and put the interests of His Majesty at whose pleasure each serves before that of his or her electors of his or her Electoral District.

Canada is supposed to have three separate and independent branches of Government. In this, we are the same as the US.

With this in mind, I point out to you that you don’t see the President on the floor during a session of Congress. Nor do you see any Secretary of State on the floor during a session of Congress.

Please explain to me why we have ministers of the Crown (who are just like secretaries of State) on the floor of our House of Commons (which is just like Congress)?

Whose interests do you think these ministers of the Crown/MPs are putting first? The husband (His Majesty) or the wife (the electors from the Electoral Districts)?

I have it, in writing, from Ontario’s Andrea Khanjan’s office itself where her personal assistant all but admitted that Andrea Khanjan, who is supposed to be my MPP, is to put the interests of the Crown, whom she serves “at His Majesty’s pleasure” before the interests of her Electoral District. Khanjan’s assistant told me this information verbally, over the phone, to which I followed up the conversation by email, asking her to confirm or deny what she told me. She failed to deny what she told me verbally.

It’s simple, relatively speaking

Law is not complicated. All the obfuscation surrounding the law is what complicates it.

Nor is it necessary for a country to elect a leader like a President as we are already supposed to have full control over any leader who may be appointed by King Charles III, His Majesty of Canada.

Why?

Because, should we put our House back into constitutional order, the House of Commons has all the power and control over the creation of public contracts (Acts of legislation) to control every leader of Canada because every Canadian leader “of Canada” is nothing more than a public servant who is to be controlled by Acts of legislation, made by our elected representatives with our consent because they are public contracts.

Except if your elected representative, like my elected representative, is putting either his or her party or His Majesty before his or her Electoral District, then like my MPP, your elected representatives are in Conflict of Interest, in breach of his or her Fiduciary Duty and as such is operating without proper consent of his or her Electoral District. Wouldn’t you agree?

No leader of Canada, not His Majesty, nor the Governor General, may act without a public contract (Act of legislation), which provides any one of them with the authority to act.

And, anyone claiming to be Prime Minister is not a leader of Canada, because Canada has no Prime Minister. The Title has been coined and styled by private political party corporations.

Read through this a second time. Each rule I cited from the Constitution, I cited as an authority in law.

Let all this sink in.

If you are ready to take back the House of Commons from private corporate political parties and re-establish it as a house of independent representatives, as it should be, or at least interested in learning more, and you are prepared to potentially have your name and address end up on the public record, please sign up at forms.gle/ScMnNE9uh6TkxJtw6. No one will be included in any public action, with name or address on public record, without additional consent. The rules of privacy will be respected.

It’s time that we individually stand up and unite in this one just cause: restoring the balance of power by restoring our House of Commons, and eventually our Provincial Legislatures, to Houses of independent Electoral District representatives, which gives every Electoral District of Canada equal standing and equal voice in the House of Commons.

It’s time for Canadians to take back our Nation from the Globalists and their agenda.

It’s not only possible, it’s necessary. And it may be done peacefully by simply standing on Canada’s Supreme Law!

Originally published at amandaridding.substack.com